Children and parents' perspectives on the acceptability of three management strategies for dental caries in primary teeth within the 'Filling Children's Teeth: Indicated or Not' (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial - a qualitative study.
| Author | |
|---|---|
| Abstract | :  The Filling Children's Teeth: Indicated Or Not? (FiCTION) randomised controlled trial (RCT) aimed to explore the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of managing dental caries in children's primary teeth. The trial compared three management strategies: conventional caries management with best practice prevention (C + P), biological management with best practice prevention (B + P) and best practice prevention alone (PA)-based approaches. Recently, the concept of treatment acceptability has gained attention and attempts have been made to provide a conceptual definition, however this has mainly focused on adults. Recognising the importance of evaluating the acceptability of interventions in addition to their effectiveness, particularly for multi-component complex interventions, the trial design included a qualitative component. The aim of this component was to explore the acceptability of the three strategies from the perspectives of the child participants and their parents. | 
| Year of Publication | :  2020 | 
| Journal | :  BMC oral health | 
| Volume | :  20 | 
| Issue | :  1 | 
| Number of Pages | :  69 | 
| Date Published | :  2020 | 
| URL | :  https://bmcoralhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12903-020-1060-6 | 
| DOI | :  10.1186/s12903-020-1060-6 | 
| Short Title | :  BMC Oral Health | 
| Download citation |