Skip to main content

IPO Reversed Because Communications Were Neither Explicitly nor Implicitly Threatening

Court of Appeals
Case Number:


Case Status:
Unpublished Case
Rendered Date:

Repeated and unwanted communication did not rise to the level of behavior necessary to warrant an IPO, as the defendant’s behavior was neither explicitly nor implicitly threatening. Reversed and remanded because the current IPO statute requires stalking plus an implicit or explicit threat.

Attachment Size
2018-CA-001728-ME.pdf (159.96 KB) 159.96 KB