Skip to main content

Interpersonal Protective Order; Stalking; Harassment

Court of Appeals
Case Number:


Case Status:
Published Case
Rendered Date:

The evidence presented did not rise to the level of a “course of conduct” which seriously alarms, annoys, intimidates, or harasses the person and serves no legitimate purpose and would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial mental distress. In addition, when petitioning the Court to extend an IPO, acts cannot simply be the same acts that were relied upon more than three prior to support the initial order. Vacated.

Attachment Size
2022-CA-000946.PDF (174.77 KB) 174.77 KB